User blog comment:PlantyThePottedPlant/Random Topic Blogging III: Blog Harder/@comment-1647442-20140814203045/@comment-4121682-20140815224315

Goldy, I cannot even begin to describe what misinformation you're operating on... (I'd also love to know where you're getting your news from...)

The kid in question was in a struggle, halfway in the police car, with the officers, most likely trying to go after his weapon, which is, by definition, assault on an officer, and they had no choice but to fire on him to protect himselves. The fabricated "eyewitness accounts" from the lowlife, belligerent loyalists are the stories making their way into the sensationalized news, most notably into biased news networks like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and the likes of all of them (all of which have been under fire and losing ratings lately due to continued and exposed media dishonesty surrounding major events like elections, which they have refused to apologize for). And it doesn't help when you have people like Al Sharpton coming in and firing up the black communities in Ferguson against a case of "racism" when the official report (which now has surverillence video to confirm it, in breaking news) was not even out at the time. And now, you've got looting, violent crime, and civil unrest in a city that was once described as peaceful, where there were no ill race relations at all - and everyone involved in this chaos is all operating under the notion that he was a saint of a kid who was simply shot because he was black and "peacefully opposing racist police officers", when he was, in fact, assaulting the officers in question in their own car, trying to make a grab for their weapons, and then trying to run off when they fired warning shots.

And my beef with reverse racists is that they are making Pastor Martin Luther King, Jr. weep form within his grave at the tragedy of the modern agenda of black activism. He warned many times that no matter how many victories they won or continued trying to win, they should never be as bad as their oppressors, or try to "avenge their people" against them years later for the sins of their fathers. I'm sorry, but I don't care what racial minority you are - you have no right to wage war on the white majority simply because your ancestors were persecuted by their ancestors. Their children are not guilty of their sins, and do not deserve to be the victims of unfounded revenge. Don't get me wrong - I find racist white people a complete pain in the ass. They are on the wrong side of history and can't get over themselves or their prejudicial notions of superiority based only on the color of someone's skin. But I find reverse discrimination even more obnoxious, because they, the historically-oppressed group, are now just repeating history all over again by being no better than their past enemies. And that is why I can't stand the agenda (and pay attention, please, because I said  the agenda, not the people) of Black Power groups, La Raza groups, LGBT activist groups, and First-World Feminists - their actions are all misguidedly targeting the majority that once persecuted them as if they are their judge, jury, and executioners. They are fighting non-existant enemies whose only relation to the sins of the past is their ancestors, and not them, personally. And for the record, I have no respect for Skinheads or other White Supremecist groups; they're on the wrong side of history and human evolution. But so is anyone else who insists on making the majority groups "pay for what they've done" in the past. The great Mohandas Ghandi said that "an eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind."

'FORGIVE AND MOVE ON, HUMANITY! QUIT TRYING TO GET EVEN WITH EACH OTHER LIKE A BUNCH OF 2-YEAR-OLDS WHO CAN BARELY EVEN USE THE TOILET ON THEIR OWN.'

PS - the new surveillence video confirms that he and his friend had just finished robbing and assaulting the cashier of a convenienve store just before the police arrived; anyone who argues this point is simply a fool who I'm not wasting my time arguing with